Find the latest bookmaker offers available across all uk gambling sites www.bets.zone Read the reviews and compare sites to quickly discover the perfect account for you.

Wema Bank CEO, chairman, other executives risk jail over contempt

Wema Bank CEO, Chairman, other executives risk jail over contempt

…………………………………..

Chukwujekwu Aneke, presiding Judge of a Federal High Court, sitting in Lagos south west Nigeria has ordered that Wema Bank Plc and its six officials cited for contempt or disobeying the order of the court should appear before it on Monday, February 17, 2020.

They are to explain why they should not be sent to prison for flagrant disobedience extant positive orders of the court

The affected officials of the bank are: Ademola Adebise, managing director; and Babatunde Kasali, chairman.

Other are Moruf Oseni, deputy managing director; Wole Akinleye, executive director; Folake Sanu, executive director; and Johnson Lebile, company secretary.

The order of the court was sequel to two different similar garnishee suits filed before the court by Chief Ajibola Aribisala, SAN Lagos lawyer, on behalf of Heritage Bank.

The first one against Ondo State Government and the Attorney General of the state, and the second one against Idanre Local Government Universal Basic Education Authority, Ondo State Government and Attorney General of Ondo State.

Heritage Bank having obtained judgement against the two parties at an Ondo state high court in the sum of N1billion out of which N600million has been paid, leaving a balance of about N400million, while the judgement against Idanre Local Government Universal Basic Education Authority is in the sum of N405.4 million.

Heritage  Bankthen initiated garnishee proceedings against the parties in the two suits.

On 6th of December 2019, the court made the order nisi against Wema bank Plc absolute, attaching the principal judgement sum of N134 million.

Wema Bank Plc, thereafter, deposed to an affidavit that Ondo State Government has N745 million standing to its credit and same has been attached in compliance with the order of the court.

However, the bank refused to comply with the order of the court to pay the money despite the demand made by Chief Aribisala on behalf of Heritage Bank.

However, Wema Bank, in its response letter claimed not to comply with the order of the court based on the Noticed of Appeal and Motion for Stay of Execution filed by the Ondo state Government at the Court of Appeal.

Thereafter, Heritage Bank caused the Registrar to issue form 48, notice of consequence of disobedience of order of the court against the officers of the bank. Still, the order of the court was not obeyed,hence the need for the issuance of form 49 asking the parties cited for contempt to show cause why order of committal should not be made against them.

On the 5th day of February, 2020 when the matter came up for hearing, Chief Ajibola Aribisala, SAN, in his argument and submission before the court contended that it is obvious that parties cited for contempt are not in court and that the court must compel their presence. He then urged the court to issue bench warrant against officials of Wema Bank Plc, cited for contempt to compel them to appear.

However, the counsel for the officials of Wema Bank cited for contempt, Mr Wemimo Ogunde, SAN, contended that the form 49 was filed and served on the parties and before then Wema Bank had already filed an application for stay of execution pending appeal and that the record of appeal had already been entered at the Court of Appeal.
Consequently, after listening to the two parties the court adjourned till 14th February 2020, for ruling.
Justice Aneke in his ruling relating to the two suits said: “The said appeal lodge by the parties cited for contempt has nothing to do with the form 49 served on them for their failure to comply with the order of the court in respect to the order made absolute against Wema Bank Plc .

Accordingly, the parties cited for contempt are hereby given 72hours from today till Monday 17th of February, 2020 to appear before the court to explain why committal order would not be made against them for flagrant disobedience of the extant positive orders of the court.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *